Mulvey on the Figure of the Woman

“Woman then stands in patriarchal culture as signifier for the male other, bound by a symbolic over in which man can live out his phantasies and obsessions through linguistic command by imposing them on the silent image of woman still tied to her place as bearer of meaning, not maker of meaning.”

— Laura MulveyVisual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Criticism, Photography, Politics, Theory, Thought Tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Williams on Williams

“The art world is one of the few public areas that allow for speculative thought or slowed down vision. The camera, the gallery, the museum, the play between language and images, are all part of a workshop to make things that could be interesting and useful to others. I hope that I am providing models for use and specifically models for a kind of seeing related to New Objectivity, which allow for the sustained observation of an object that exists in the world outside the art. A model is a representation of a system. The structure of a system determines our behavior. This unfreedom is the subject of my work.”

— from Christopher Williams: The 19th Draft in DIS magazine

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Photography, Theory, Thought Tags , , , , , , , , , ,

Remember, Body by Cavafy

Body, remember not only how much you were loved,
not only the beds on which you lay,
but also those desires which for you
plainly glowed in the eyes,
and trembled in the voice — and some
chance obstacle made them futile.
Now that all belongs to the past,
it is almost as if you had yielded
to those desires too — remember,
how they glowed, in the eyes looking at you;
how they trembled in the voice, for you, remember, body.

Cavafy, (1863 – 1933)

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Poetry Tags , , , , , ,

One off: Collier Schorr.

Craig Garrett: Earlier you asked me whether I thought your photos looked “too gay.” Having always focused on the feminist angle of your work — and, specifically, how decoding masculine poses might be relevant for a lesbian — I confess I’d never really perceived them that way. Your images are extremely popular with gay men, though — not just collectors but critics and curators as well. And you seem conflicted about this side of their popularity. I don’t remember your exact wording, but you said that a lot of male critics had taken your work to speak for their own desire. Most of them surely appreciate its ambiguity, knowing full well that your are not a gay man yourself. But what do you think this phenomenon says about what kinds of dialogues are (and are not) encouraged in the art world today?

Collier Schorr: Objectification has usually been a male mainstay. Homosociality is, without a doubt, present in any project that involves itself in a male dominated arena, such as sports or the military. However, it may be that some gay male critics have become too comfortable in the idea that male sexuality, or men being caught in the gaze, is the property of male homosexuality. That type of “ownership” allows that women don’t look at men and that when men appear a certain way it is a performance for other men. It’s just another way that women’s desire is undermined. This does give me pause, not in image making as much in the editing process afterwards. The struggle is how to represent men in a more fully defined way — i.e., tenderness, vulnerability, physicality — without falling into the trap of an assumed gay male gaze. In a way you have to search for varieties of ugliness, to almost de-aesthetify the image, to try and divest it of iconic perfections, all the while making pictures where the camera seems to fall in love.” (…)

Untitled, from “Neighbors/Nachbarn” by Collier Schorr [SteidlMACK, 2006]

(…)

“You know, people say, “How come you don’t take pictures of girls?” And I say, “Well I do, I just use boys to do them.””

Collier Schorr, in an interview with Craig Garrett, Flash Art no. 237, Jan/Feb 2004.

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Photography, Thought Tags , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Kozloff on the Camera and culture

“Without asking so much as the viewer’s leave, photographers have deprogrammed the genres and tossed media in a juggle of unexpected meanings. They remind us, if only by contrast, of how often our understanding of photographs originates on the basis of their decorum – imagery and style proper to the media occasion. But in consumer society, rules of decorum are chronically redefined or even subverted in the search for novelty. Many of the images we see around us today have no trouble communicating that impulse. Technological advances condensed or interrupted the work of photographic propriety; boredom with formulae deflected it; urgency diminished it. In fact, restless media have affected (if they haven’t exactly shaped) conduct, made it more open to psychological discovery and to epochal disturbance.”

— Max KozloffStreet & Studio: An Urban History of Photography,” in TATE Etc, Issue 13, Summer 2008

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Criticism, Photography, Thought Tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cadava on the Photograph, Ruin & Time

“There can be no image that is not about destruction and survival, and this is especially the case in the image of ruin. We might even say that the image of ruin tells us what is true of every image: that it bears witness to the enigmatic relation between death and survival, loss and life, destruction and preservation, mourning and memory. It also tells us, if it can tell us anything at all, that what dies, is lost, and mourned within the image—even as it survives, lives on, and struggles to exist—is the image itself. This is why the image of ruin-again, speaking for all images—so often speaks of the death, if not the impossibility of the image. It announces the inability of the image to tell a story: the story of ruin, for example. It is because of this silence in the face of loss and catastrophe—even when ruin remains undeclared—that the image is always at the same time an image of ruin, an image about the ruin of the image, about the ruin of the image’s capacity to show, to represent, to address and evoke the persons, events, things, truths, histories, lives and deaths to which it would refer.”

— Eduardo CadavaLapsus Imaginis: The Image in Ruins,” October, Vol. 96 (Spring 2001)

 

Awoiska van der Molen, #202-10, from “Sequester

 

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Criticism, Photography, Theory, Thought Tags , , , , , , , , ,

Duchamp on Photography

“photography is not limited to the role of copyist. It is a marvellous explorer of those aspects that our retina never records, and that, every day, inflict such cruel contradictions on the adorers of familiar visions that are so few, whose turn was over before a bold navigator could go around the world.”

Marcel Duchamp, “Deceiving Appearances” (1926)

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Criticism, Photography, Thought Tags , , , , , , , ,

Proulx on the Landscape

“Landscape for me is geography, geology, archaeology, agronomy, agriculture, the violent character of the atmosphere, black squirrels and wild oats, bulldozers. It is jet trails and barbed wire, government land, malpais, dry stream beds, it is politics, desert plant robbers, introduced species, abandoned vehicles, roads, ghost towns, nuclear test grounds, swamps, mine tailings, bridges, dead dogs.”

E. Annie Proulx, speaking in Myths of the West: Photographers, Filmmakers and Writers at MoMA, March 31st 2009

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Thought Tags , , , , , , , , , ,

Structures in Sand, by John Ashbery

They still connect
(it still connects?)—
the feeling of the middle of the evening
as it is overtaken
by its sides.
And then everything must be taken up
and washed and put back together again.
Why is that so?
True happiness
(which we can’t have, while we are close to believing
in it) ordains it, depends on life that ends.

Do you have enough
to refer the thing on this thing,
of many spirits
and cartoons?
There was just as much of the world then,
but it was distributed
less evenly.
Rome was closer than Canossa,
the old king dead,
dangling from mistletoe.
Breeze sends us back
to house.
Having been warned we strike
the new mission.
When are you returning?

— John Ashbery “Structures in Sand”

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Photography, Poetry Tags , , , , , , , ,

Lines, by Vallejo

Each ribbon of fire,
that in search of Love,
I cast and vibrate in lamentable roses,
births me to the burial of my eve.
I don’t know if the throbbing where I search
will be the painting of rock,
or the perennial birthing of heart.

There is stretched out in the very depth of being,
an ultranervous axis, a profound plumb line.
The thread of destiny!
Love will deflect such a law of life
toward the voice of Man;
and will give us supreme liberty
in blue transubstantiation, virtuous,
against what is blind and fatal.

May there throb in each cipher,
hidden away in fragile dawns,
a even better Jesus of another great Yolk!

And afterwards… The other line…
A Baptist who watches, watches, watches…
And, riding the intangible curve,
a foot bathed in purple.

César Vallejo, from Three Poems

 

Discussion Leave a comment Category Art, Photography, Poetry Tags , , , ,